 |
-
POLICY
CONCERNING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FACULTY MERIT INCREASE
-
AND SERVICE
SALARY STEP INCREASE PROGRAMS
-
-
FAM
585
-
FSD 99-02.R1
Faculty Affairs Committee
May 2000
1. Preamble
This document is designed to implement
the sections in Article 31 in the Memorandum of Understanding for employees
in the Faculty Bargaining Unit (Unit 3) dealing with the Faculty Merit
Increase and Service Salary Step Increase Programs. All Faculty Merit
Increase (FMI) and Service Salary Step Increase (SSSI) awards at California
State University, San Bernardino shall be made in conformance with this
policy. In any instance of conflict between the Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) and this FMI policy, the MOU shall govern.
All faculty, both tenure-track and temporary,
have the right to be involved in the departmental determination of the
appropriate FMI structure, all faculty have the right to participate
in voting for and serving on department committees should that be the
mechanism chosen, and all faculty have the right to participate in voting
for and serving on the campus appeals panel. All appeals panel and committee
members shall have equal voting rights as committee or panel members
regardless of time base. Each department shall be responsible for ensuring
that adequate records concerning temporary faculty are maintained.
2. Definitions
| 2.1 |
The term
"department" shall be used to refer to an academic department or
equivalent unit for the purpose of this FMI policy. The three equivalent
units shall be (a) coaches, (b) counselors, and (c) librarians.
Each department or equivalent unit may have a "Department" FMI Committee.
Individual instructional faculty unit employees in Undergraduate
Studies shall be grouped with the academic department(s) most closely
related to the discipline(s) they teach for the portion of their
time base relevant to each department. Temporary faculty in a college
teaching interdisciplinary courses and not assigned to a department
shall make a permanent decision concerning with which department
in the college they choose to be grouped for the purpose of this
FMI policy. Tenure-track faculty with joint appointments shall be
assigned to their primary department for the purpose of FMI review.
Temporary faculty teaching in more than one department shall be
reviewed in each department for the portion of their time base relevant
to that department. |
| 2.2 |
The term "department
chair" shall be used to refer to an academic department chair or
equivalent for the purpose of this FMI policy. The department chair
equivalent for coaches shall be the Athletics Compliance Officer.
The department chair equivalent for Librarians shall be the Faculty
Senate Librarian representative. The department chair equivalent
for Counselors shall be their immediate supervisors. These definitions
of department chair equivalents do not imply an expectation that
Management Personnel Plan faculty will serve on department FMI or
SSSI committees. |
| 2.3 |
The term "college"
shall be used to refer to an academic college or equivalent unit
for the purpose of this FMI policy. The three units equivalent to
colleges shall be (a) Athletics, (b) Student Affairs, and (c) Library. |
| 2.4 |
The term "dean" shall
be used to refer to an academic dean or equivalent for the purpose
of this FMI policy. For coaches, the Director of Athletics shall
be the college dean equivalent. For librarians, the University Librarian
shall be the dean equivalent. For counselors, the Vice President
for Student Affairs shall be the dean equivalent. |
3. Annual Activities Report
(AAR)
Each faculty unit employee shall submit three
copies of a completed Annual Activities Report (AAR) to her/his department
chair.
| 3.1 |
For 1998/99
and 1999/00, the AAR shall be submitted no later than October 1,
1999. This report shall detail annual faculty activities in separate
sections as follows. |
| a) |
For 1998/99,
all appropriate activities from July 1, 1995 or from the period
covered in the last successful PSSI review or from the date of
initial appointment (whichever beginning date is most recent)
through June 30, 1998; FMIs to be effective July 1, 1998. |
| b) |
For 1999/00, all appropriate
activities from July 1, 1998 through June 30, 1999; FMIs to be
effective July 1, 1999. |
| 3.2 |
The AAR shall
be submitted no later than October 1 of each year thereafter. In
fiscal year 2000/01, the time period of review for activities contained
in the AAR shall be July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000. Additional
time lines for the FMI program for each year shall be as provided
in Appendix G of the MOU. |
| 3.3 |
The AAR format
shall be as shown in Attachment 1. Each AAR
shall include the faculty unit employee's rank/classification, salary,
date of appointment, and whether the faculty unit employee is eligible
for a Service Salary Step Increase. |
| 3.4 |
The AAR must
cover only the designated time period. If an activity is spread
out over more than this period, the AAR must describe the contribution
to this activity which was made during that time period. |
4. FMI Eligibility
All full- and part-time faculty unit employees
who submit completed AARs are eligible for and shall be considered for
FMIs except those indicated in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 below.
| 4.1 |
The following
employees are not eligible for FMIs: Substitute Instructional Faculty,
Instructional Faculty - Extension, Instructional Faculty - Special
Programs, Instructional Faculty - Summer Arts, Instructional Faculty
- Summer Session, persons not employed during the applicable review
period as specified in Section 3, and persons on full-time leave
without pay for personal reasons during the entire applicable review
period. |
| 4.2 |
Faculty unit employees
who indicate on their AARs that they decline to participate in the
FMI program shall not be considered for FMIs. |
| 4.3 |
The following
is a clarification of FMI eligibility for part-time temporary employees: |
| 1) |
For 1998/99,
part-time temporary faculty unit employees who submit completed
AARs, who had an appointment at any point during the period July
1, 1995 through June 30, 1998, and who are eligible to receive
the FMI award shall be eligible for consideration for an FMI. |
| 2) |
For 1999/00 and thereafter,
part-time temporary faculty unit employees who submit completed
AARs, who had an appointment at any point during the period of
the review cycle, and who are eligible to receive the FMI award
shall be eligible for consideration for an FMI. |
| 3) |
A part-time temporary
faculty unit employee shall have an appointment at some point
during the current academic year for which the FMI awards are
effective in order to be eligible to receive an FMI. The department
shall be responsible for making its best determination as to whether
or not a part-time temporary faculty unit employee has reason
to expect an appointment for the Winter and/or Spring quarters
of that current academic year when implementing Sections 4.3.a
and 4.3.b. |
5. Criteria
| 5.1 |
Faculty unit employees
shall be eligible for FMIs for demonstrated performance commensurate
with rank, work assignment, and years of service for: |
| a) |
the quality
of the unit member's teaching alone; |
| b) |
teaching and scholarship; |
| c) |
teaching and service
to the University and community; or |
| d) |
teaching, scholarship,
and service to the University and community. |
| |
Tenure track
faculty will be evaluated under category 5.1.d unless their work
assignment specifies otherwise. |
| 5.2 |
Faculty unit employees
whose performance does not include assignments in one or more of
the above areas shall nonetheless be eligible for an FMI on the
basis of their performance in the individual areas of their assignment.
Examples would be part-time faculty assigned only to teaching or
full-time faculty on sabbatical leave for a year. |
| 5.3 |
Teaching is broad and inclusive.
Teaching encompasses instruction and such activities as advising,
mentoring, supervision (e.g., individual studies, thesis direction,
field supervision), and a range of contributions to improving
student learning (e.g., curriculum revision, course and program
coordination, assessment of learning outcomes, and applications
of technology).
For faculty unit employees who are
coaches, counselors, or librarians, "professional assignments"
shall substitute for the "teaching" category. |
| 5.4 |
Scholarship includes discovery
(traditionally labeled research, especially published or presented
to professional audiences), integration (e.g., inter- or cross-disciplinary
efforts), application (e.g., used in teaching or solving social,
community, or technical problems), and creative activity (e.g.,
works of art, performances). |
| 5.5 |
Service to the University
and community is likewise broad. Service to the University and community
includes the activity necessary to the faculty role in shared governance
of the institution (CSU and its campuses) and activity applying
the unit employee's expertise to benefit the University and its
community in general. Examples of service include significant committee
work; student outreach and retention; participation in university
and community organizations, community partnerships, professional
associations, faculty associations, and appropriate governmental
boards and commissions; advancement of public support for the University;
and lectures and seminars to community groups. |
For instructional faculty,
service shall be defined as university service and/or community service,
and/or administrative assignment. Administrative assignment shall be
defined as duties performed as department chair, as program coordinator,
or for any other administrative duties for which assigned time has been
provided at the systemwide, university or college level.
6. Maximum Amounts
and Types of Faculty Merit Increases
No faculty unit employee shall receive more than a 7.5% FMI in any year.
| 6.1 |
Permanent
increase in base salary. An FMI shall be a permanent increase
in the base salary of the faculty unit employee on the salary schedule
in Appendix C to the MOU, except for faculty unit employees (other
than Professors) who have reached the top of their rank or classification
in the salary schedule in Appendix C. |
| 6.2 |
Bonus (not a permanent
increase in the base salary of the individual). An FMI shall
be a bonus of no more than the equivalent of an annual salary increase
of 7.5% in the case of any faculty unit employee (except for those
at the rank of Professor) who has reached the top of her/his rank
or classification in the salary schedule in Appendix C to the MOU.
An FMI may also be a bonus of no more than an annual salary increase
of 7.5% in the case of any faculty unit member whose demonstrated
performance is being recognized as part of an activity or project
conducted by a team, department, or group of employees. |
7. Levels of
Review and the General Review Process
7.1 There shall be three levels
of review as follows:
| a) |
The Department, |
| b) |
The College Dean, and |
| c) |
The President and/or
designee. |
| 7.2 |
A faculty unit member
shall not review his/her own AAR for an FMI. However, no faculty
unit employee shall become ineligible for service on a Department
FMI Committee because he/she is being considered for an FMI. |
| 7.3 |
Each level of review shall
forward all AARs, as well as the recommendations from that level
on each of the faculty unit members, to the next level of review.
Failure to meet any established deadline for recommendations shall
automatically result in the forwarding of all AARs and lower level
recommendations to the next level of review. The timetable for FMI
review process is shown in Attachment 2. |
| 7.4 |
Recommendations for each
faculty unit employee at the first two levels of review in the FMI
process shall include the following: |
| a) |
whether
the faculty unit employee is recommended to receive an FMI, and |
| b) |
if the recommendation
in 7.4.a is yes, the amount of the increase recommended. |
8. Allocation
of Funds for FMI Recommendations
The total funds available for FMIs
in a specific cycle shall be subdivided as follows for the purpose of
recommendations at the review levels specified in Section 7.1.
| 8.1 |
An amount
equal to 85% of the FMI pool will be assigned to departments as
the amount they can employ in their recommendations. These funds
shall be distributed to departments on a filled FTEF prorata basis. This amount in each department shall be termed the Department
FMI pool. |
| 8.2 |
An amount equal to 10%
of the FMI pool will be allocated to the president and/or designee.
The expenditure of these funds shall be reported as a distinct
category of the campus report required in the MOU. This amount
shall be termed the President's FMI pool. |
| 8.3 |
The campus shall reserve
an amount equal to 5% of the FMI pool (the FMI appeal pool) to
fund successful appeals. |
| 8.4 |
FMI funds not used in
a particular cycle shall be rolled forward in the aggregate and
become part of the total funds available for FMIs in the next
annual FMI cycle. They are not rolled forward in the specific
categories 8.1, 8.2, or 8.3. |
9. Department FMI Recommendation
Structure
For the purpose of arriving at Departmental
FMI recommendations, departments are free to use a Department FMI Committee,
the department chair, a designee, or any combination of the preceding.
The decision on structure is to be made on an annual basis by a vote
of all faculty unit employees in the department. It is permissible to
allow for procedures that permit votes proportional to time base for
part-time unit members. The department chair shall be responsible for
conducting the vote and for notifying the dean concerning the department
decision regarding the structure by which department FMI decisions will
be made. Attachment 3 contains four specific
alternatives for making department FMI recommendations suggested (but
not required) by the Faculty Senate. Department procedures must ensure
that no faculty unit member shall participate in the evaluation of her/his
own AAR.
10. FMI Merit Rating and
Recommendations at the Department Level
Departments shall review the AARs of all
qualified faculty unit employees assigned to the department, including
department chairs. Department reviewers may ask faculty members to clarify
the information in the AAR. For each award period, the Department shall
rate the merit of each faculty unit member using the following scale:
Departments are free to determine how to
relate the amount of an FMI recommendation to the rating scale above.
Two possible approaches are shown in Attachment
4.
Departments may recommend that an individual
faculty unit member receive an FMI at any amount up to the maximum amount
provided in Section 6. The Department's recommendations shall include
whether the faculty unit employee should receive an FMI and also the amount
of the FMI. The total dollars of the department's recommendations for
all FMIs recommended for faculty unit employees in the department shall
not exceed the amount of dollars allocated to the Department in Section
8.1.
Department FMI recommendations and comments
shall be made on the FMI Recommendation Form (Attachment
5) for each faculty unit member and forwarded along with all AARs
to the College Dean. For each faculty unit employee, the department can
forward only one FMI Recommendation Form to the dean and that form can
contain only one set of recommendations regarding FMI ranking, whether
to recommend an FMI and how much.
11. College
Dean Review and Recommendation
| 11.1 |
All Department
FMI recommendations shall be reviewed by the College Dean. The Dean
may concur or disagree with the recommendations, may change the
amount of any recommended FMI, and/or may recommend an FMI for any
member of the department that was not recommended by the department.
The dean may recommend that an individual receive an FMI of any
amount up to the maximum amount provided in Section 6. It is the
Dean's responsibility to make final recommendations for disposition
of all the FMI funds allocated to departments within the College.
Each recommendation shall be made on the FMI Recommendation Form. |
| 11.2 |
The Dean shall forward
the AAR and all recommendations from the first two levels of review
to the President and/or designee. |
12. President and/or designee
Review and Decision
The President and/or designee shall review
each AAR and all relevant recommendations from the first two levels
of review. The President and/or designee may concur or disagree with
the recommendations, may change the amount of any recommended FMI, and/or
may grant an FMI for any member of the department that was not recommended
by the department or by the dean. The president may grant that an individual
receive an FMI of any amount up to the maximum amount provided in Section
6. Each decision shall be made on the FMI Recommendation Form. The total
of the recommendations at this level shall not exceed 95% of the annual
FMI funds available, i.e., the total of the department FMI pools plus
the President's FMI pool.
13. Communication, Rebuttals,
and Appeal During the AAR Review Process
| 13.1 |
As soon as
Department FMI recommendations are forwarded to the Dean, the Dean
shall provide each faculty unit member with a copy of her/his Department
FMI recommendation. If a faculty unit member disagrees with the
recommendation, she/he may file a written rebuttal with the Dean
within seven calendar days of being sent the recommendation. |
| 13.2 |
The Dean's recommendation
on each faculty unit member shall be forwarded simultaneously to
the faculty unit member and the Office of Academic Personnel. If
the faculty unit member disagrees with the recommendation, she/he
may submit a written rebuttal to the Office of Academic Personnel
within seven calendar days of being sent the recommendation. |
| 13.3 |
The President and/or designee's
decision on each faculty unit member shall be forwarded to the faculty
unit member and the Dean. If the President and/or designee reduces
the FMI recommended by the Dean or the Department, the affected
faculty unit member may submit a written rebuttal to and appeal
the decision of the President and/or designee. The rebuttal and
appeal request shall be submitted in writing to the Office of Academic
Personnel within 14 calendar days of being sent the decision. |
| 13.4 |
The appeal shall be heard
by an appeal committee as described in the MOU. The decision of
the appeal committee shall be final and binding. This decision shall
be forwarded simultaneously to the faculty unit member, the President
and/or designee, and the Dean. |
The appeal panel from which the appeal committee
is selected shall be elected at the beginning of Fall quarter by the Faculty
Senate Constituent Unit elections officers. Five members shall be elected
from each Constituent Unit. For this purpose, the five constituent units
are defined as follows: Arts & Letters and Library; Business and Public
Administration; Education; Natural Sciences and Coaches; Social and Behavioral
Sciences and Counselors. All faculty unit employees, tenure track and
temporary, shall be eligible to run and vote. Voting shall be done by
the preferential method. When the appeal committee is selected by lot
from the panel, one faculty unit employee shall be selected from each
constituent unit.
14. Use of FMI
Materials in RPT Deliberations
| 14.1 |
The decision
concerning granting an FMI shall not be considered in deliberations
regarding reappointment, promotion, or tenure (RPT) unless the faculty
unit member includes the material in her/his Personnel Action File
(PAF). This shall not preclude the consideration of any facts during
RTP deliberations which are also considered during FMI deliberations.
AARs and notification of all FMI decisions may be placed in both
the PAF and any Working PAF established for the purpose of RPT evaluations
at the discretion of the faculty unit employee. |
| 14.2 |
The award of FMIs shall
not be considered personnel recommendations, decisions or actions
which must be based upon a faculty unit member's Personnel Action
File. However, this shall not preclude review of a faculty unit
member's WPAF during FMI deliberations. |
15. Campus Information Regarding
Those Receiving FMIs
A list of faculty unit employees who have
received an FMI, their ranks, the amount of each FMI, and their department
affiliations shall be made public on campus within one month after final
decisions regarding FMIs are made. Awards shall also be reported by
amount of increase, gender, and ethnicity but without individual name.
Completed AARs shall be made available
in the College Office for a period of one year following publication
of the awards, for review by faculty members in that college.
16. Service
Salary Step Increase Procedures (Fiscal Year 1999-2000 and Subsequent
Years)
| 16.1 |
Faculty bargaining
unit employees eligible for an SSSI shall be reviewed by the Department
using the same committee/department chair/designee structure the
department has elected to use for the evaluation of department members
for FMIs (Section 9). The Department shall recommend whether to
grant or deny an SSSI; department procedures must ensure that no
faculty unit member shall participate in making the decision regarding
her/his own SSSI award. The department recommendation, using an
SSSI Recommendation Form, shall be forwarded to the College Dean.
Department SSSI recommendations shall be made and forwarded to the
Dean before the department FMI recommendations are made and forwarded. |
| 16.2 |
The recommendation of
the Department shall be reviewed by the College Dean, who shall
either grant or deny the SSSI. An SSSI Recommendation Form (Attachment
6) shall be used. |
| 16.3 |
The criteria to be used
when evaluating faculty bargaining unit employees for an SSSI shall
be whether the employee has demonstrated satisfactory performance
commensurate with rank, work assignment, and years of service. This
evaluation shall be based on the employee's AAR covering the prior
year and may include the employee's Working Personnel Action File. |
| 16.4 |
The decision to deny an
SSSI may be appealed as provided in the MOU, using the FMI Appeals
Panel. The procedure for selecting an SSSI Appeals Committee shall
be the same as for selecting an FMI Appeals Committee. A person
who has been selected to serve on the FMI Appeals Committee may
decline to serve on that committee, if she/he has previously been
selected for the SSSI Appeals Committee, or vice versa. |
Acrobat Viewer
FSD 99-02.R1
Approved by the Faculty Senate
Jeanne King, Chair
Reviewed by the Academic Affairs Council
Louis Fernandez, Provost
andVice President for Academic
Affairs
Approved by the President
Albert K. Karnig
s99-02.R1
Back
to Section V
|